• 23 Apr




    Partial color allows a designer to hone in on a particular part of an image and enhance it with color.

    This makes the images really “pop” and this technique can be used for many purposes. For example, in advertising or corporate designs, features of a product can be highlighted that the eye may not normally be drawn to.

    When used for artistic photography, non-focal points of the image can be colored in order to draw attention to them. Whatever the use, this fresh technique is popping up all over print design and on the web, and we’ve gathered some of the best examples here for you to enjoy.

    This effect is easily achieved with most graphic software such as Photoshop. If you’re still wondering how to do it, check out this tutorial for a step-by-step on how to achieve partial color.



    Compiled exclusively for WDD by Aquil Akhter.

    What do you think of this technique? Post links to other great examples in our comments section.


  • 75 Comments »

     
    #1
    Peter
    April 23rd, 2010 at 08:52

    Beautiful.

     
     
    #2
    Ann
    April 23rd, 2010 at 09:00

    Tacky and antiquated.

     
     
    #3
    ranaman
    April 23rd, 2010 at 12:12

    Have to agree with you here Ann. Very tacky…

     
     
    #4
    sada
    April 23rd, 2010 at 09:05

    Good collection… Thanks for sharing!!!

     
     
    #5
    Buy My House
    April 23rd, 2010 at 09:35

    Mind boggling and exceptional.

     
     
    #6
    Martin
    April 23rd, 2010 at 09:39

    Some brilliant examples here, time to fire up Photoshop :)

     
     
    #7
    Web Design Maidstone
    April 23rd, 2010 at 09:50

    Some really nice examples, have always loved the effect created, incorporating htis into a website at the moment actually so good timing!

     
     
    #8
    Design ideas
    April 23rd, 2010 at 10:04

    Lovely collection

     
     
    #9
    Janos
    April 23rd, 2010 at 10:59

    Cheap. On of the most kitschy effects ever.

     
     
    #10
    Thomas Günther
    April 23rd, 2010 at 11:37

    Awesome collection! I love that effect :)

     
     
    #11
    Shinden
    April 23rd, 2010 at 11:39

    Simply Beautiful. Amazing.

     
     
    #12
    Storm
    April 23rd, 2010 at 12:31

    This is always a nice technique. Great examples.

     
     
    #13
    Jordan Merrick
    April 23rd, 2010 at 12:36

    When used right, it can be really exceptional.

    My previous attempt at Partial Colour using Aperture 3

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jordanmerrick/4398935351/

     
     
    #14
    Balial tariq
    April 23rd, 2010 at 12:38

    really outstanding collection..amazing list..keep it up!

     
     
    #15
    Simon
    April 23rd, 2010 at 12:48

    Nice list, this really gives an extra effect to the photos.

     
     
    #16
    Sunil
    April 23rd, 2010 at 14:12

    this style is so outdated and overdone… some examples are nice, but most are very ordinary… even though i am not a fan of this sort of stuff i think i’ve seen a lot better…

     
     
    #17
    pushpinder
    April 23rd, 2010 at 15:41

    I have clicked and processed one of the golden temple.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/baggaz/4322776700/

    Cheers!

     
     
    #18
    Taha
    April 23rd, 2010 at 15:46

    Beautiful pictures. I enjoyed it.

     
     
    #19
    Jordan Walker
    April 23rd, 2010 at 16:08

    way cool list of images.

     
     
    #20
    Bertrand
    April 23rd, 2010 at 16:45

    Some are good (pregnant, rusted spring…) but some are plain… useless (the one with the drinks, the picture quality isn’t even good to start with and, the one with the leaf, it’s not like it needed colors to get my attention on it).

    I wish you would have argued as to “why” they are that good, each one of them. That requires actual knowledge and gives people tools to recrete a good effect. I know it would take a lot more time to right but you’d have bonified the quality of the article. Maybe next time?

     
     
    #21
    Shawn
    April 23rd, 2010 at 16:56

    Photographers call it Spot Coloring. It’s the artistic equivalent of painting by numbers. Or maybe Popsicle stick art. It was interesting 30 years ago when it was being done in a lab. Photoshop has made it trivial.

     
     
    #22
    Simon
    April 23rd, 2010 at 17:04

    partial coloring is lame, was ever lame and will always be lame.

     
     
    #23
    Neilcooperdesign
    April 23rd, 2010 at 17:34

    This is not a good post. Very tacky and very unoriginal. In fact, it is my pet peeve when photographers do this. I think anyone can desaturate a photo and go over with the history brush!! Come on WDD!!

     
     
    #24
    Ogvidius
    April 23rd, 2010 at 18:12

    Some good shots there. I have to admit that some of them look a bit cheesy, but done well it looks great. I suppose it’s like HDR in a way! I think the best ones were the ones that just had one colour and looked quite subtle in a way. The umbrellas, post box and yellow wellingtons were great! Nice list!

     
     
    #26
    mithul
    April 23rd, 2010 at 18:37

    Hi,

    Great Collection! great idea!
    i am trying this technique in my next project.

     
     
    #27
    el
    April 23rd, 2010 at 19:04

    Seriously? This technique was “cool” in the mid-90s with those oh-so-cute cards with kids dressed as adults and bright red roses, but now it’s tacky.

     
     
    #28
    Theo Hodkin
    April 23rd, 2010 at 19:24

    Not that great, if I’m honest…
    Very amateur photos.

     
     
    #29
    Walter
    April 23rd, 2010 at 19:41

    I guess some examples are a bit bland, but when used properly, this is a powerful technique in my opinion that shouldn’t be discounted.

     
     
    #30
    Shawn
    April 23rd, 2010 at 20:08

    The problem with this effect is that in almost every case it’s not the most interesting or compelling improvement upon the original. Any improvement is a lazy improvement. Photoshop 101. Imagine if you had the “negative”. Some of this photography is great. So much potential there. What would you do with it?

    If spot coloring has artistic merit, then what about a print done with phosphorescent inks on black velvet and then displayed under a black light?

     
     
    #31
    Michelle Heffner
    April 23rd, 2010 at 20:21

    Yes! It is so exciting to see a Professional Face Painter added in this mix. I was thinking to myself if I could use something like that :)

     
     
    #32
    e11world
    April 23rd, 2010 at 21:03

    That does it.. I have to do something like this ASAP.. Really really nice samples

     
     
    #33
    Arni Web Design
    April 23rd, 2010 at 21:51

    creative art, excellent collection

     
     
    #34
    Maik
    April 23rd, 2010 at 23:16
     
     
    #35
    MyLogo
    April 23rd, 2010 at 23:36

    great images!!

     
     
    #36
    Srdjan
    April 24th, 2010 at 01:10

    I like this technique and I like contrast in any possible form or shape. I also tried it few years ago with this photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aiveldesign/3778501376/

     
     
    #37
    Hexacreative
    April 24th, 2010 at 01:58

    AMAZING!
    can you write tutorial for this?

     
     
    #38
    Crackpipe Jones
    April 24th, 2010 at 07:53

    Some beautiful photography, hindered only by the emo myspace partial color thing. Honestly the ladybug/bird and post box are beautiful looking, but the rest is shocking bad. The little girls eyes for example. That didn’t even look good in 1992.

     
     
    #39
    buroshiva
    April 24th, 2010 at 08:27

    brillant

     
     
    #40
    aledesign.it
    April 24th, 2010 at 11:31

    Great work by photoshop! Some examples are so particular…the best for me is the blond child and your eyes blu sky! So brilliant!

     
     
    #41
    Web Risorsa
    April 24th, 2010 at 13:46

    I really amazed on seeing this collection. Specially the girl with blue eyes really impressive work…

     
     
    #42
    Victor
    April 24th, 2010 at 14:11

    Nice post!
    I love this kind of art, but how many people said before, it can be tacky, kitsch and many other things. I believe the reason for a kind of this work be good you need to incorporate in the hole work the part of it you want to call attention, but you need to call attention too, so, it can be very complex to do a great partial color work!
    =D

     
     
    #43
    adone
    April 24th, 2010 at 17:30

    Creative pictures. Very good list.

     
     
    #44
    Kristelvdakker
    April 24th, 2010 at 18:45

    These are so beautiful!
    It makes me wanna grab my camera and shoot some myself!! :D

     
     
    #45
    adam
    April 24th, 2010 at 21:06

    Nice post some good work.

     
     
    #46
    Lakeside Techies
    April 24th, 2010 at 22:48

    The main image of the post is quite awesome. The little lady with blue eyes. Others are also quite good too.

     
     
    #47
    banka
    April 25th, 2010 at 20:47

    Nice post some good work.

     
     
    #48
    Mike Distras
    April 26th, 2010 at 13:41

    Got to agree with some others.

    Some are VERY tacky, and not done well at all.

    Its always overdone with new photographers as they think its an amazing new technique.

    Some of the examples I liked, but the majority were terrible.

     
     
    #49
    thewebdes
    April 26th, 2010 at 16:21

    I tried one of these a while ago after I saw a moth on a walk one day. http://tuestunim.deviantart.com/art/Moth-on-a-flower-132378522

    Bit of selecting, desaturation, mucking about with the background and a bit of an effect on the flower. I’d say it’s more of a graphic design thing than a web thing. Put it this way – I’ve never used it on a website in all the years I’ve been making them – but nice all the same.

     
     
    #50
    craz11
    April 26th, 2010 at 17:36
     
     
    #51
    alackofinspiration.com
    April 26th, 2010 at 20:13

    Man I hate this type of photo editing. It shows a lack of skill and creativity. It is used to try and make a crappy picture look good. It fails every time. On the rare occasion it works but man is it rare.

     
     
    #52
    Clippingimages
    April 27th, 2010 at 09:46

    The lady alone on the bridge with an umbrella is really fascinating. All the others are also great and this technique has increased the glamour of the images.

     
     
    #53
    TelefoNina
    April 27th, 2010 at 12:43

    Some of these photos are beautiful. The hydrant, and especially the orange umbrella!
    But others aren’t.

    In my eyes, a color key is well-used if this effect intensifies something that already is within the photo. On a rainy day the streets already seem already grey. Making them completely grey is taking the effekt one step further.

    But some photos are just ordinary – and try to become something different, special through the color key. Let’s take the photo with the cocktails. It IS a nice picture, a nice memory, but for me as a stranger there’s nothing special in it. The color key doesn’t change this. It creates a “wow”-effect for many people, but if you look twice it still is just an ordinary photo. Far from outstanding.

     
     
    #54
    Vladan
    April 28th, 2010 at 15:42

    Great collection. :-)

     
     
    #55
    News Technology
    April 28th, 2010 at 15:57

    Wow .. Great piece of work !!

     
     
    #56
    Punta del Este Real Estate
    April 28th, 2010 at 17:19

    great examples i will keep it in mind tnx

     
     
    #57
    Gerrit
    April 29th, 2010 at 15:45

    Have to agree with some previous comments. These effects appear very kitschy and nonsensical. They reduce the value of an otherwise good shot rather than adding to it. In most cases they look more like a desperate attempt to make a bad photo look presentable. A lot of these black & white photos look flat, there’s not much contrast, they lack composition, and they look like like just what they are… digicam tourist-snapshots shot in color switched to grayscale mode. I can see there’s a market for this technique perhaps in advertising to highlight a product… I have seen that used there before. But that’s about the only place I can see a use for it.

     
     
    #58
    John Godwin
    April 29th, 2010 at 17:45

    Which ones are the “outstanding” pictures? I just see a bunch of extremely average shots with some tacky colour popping.

    It wouldn’t be so bad if it was done well, but even the attempts themselves are amaterish.

    I’ve noticed these photosites are running extremely low on content recently. Do you guys just scan Flickr for anything you can find?

    Is so, here’s my page:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/johngodwin/

    Build whatever you like out of that, because it’s at least as good as what’s on here.

    Maybe you can do something like “outstanding photos by people whose names bagin with the letter ‘J’”

     
     
    #59
    grid8400
    May 1st, 2010 at 23:09

    Here’s a nice one with a ladybug:

    http://www.key2picture.nl/pages/fotografie-vak.php

     
     
    #60
    Jason
    May 3rd, 2010 at 02:57

    Awesome Pictures. So pretty, I really like them.

     
     
    #61
    Najam Siddiqi
    May 4th, 2010 at 18:14

    Nice list, this really gives an extra effect to the photos.

     
     
    #62
    Billy
    May 5th, 2010 at 21:06

    Fantastic Photos, the highlighting of one colour really makes the difference

     
     
    #63
    Darkened Soul
    May 6th, 2010 at 18:06

    Even though not all of them are as great as some others, it is a nice list though.
    My favourites being the one with the ladybug, the apple, the cards, the facepaint, the colour pencils, and the cooling towers.
    Least favourite: the one with the drinks…

     
     
    #64
    Chris
    May 9th, 2010 at 23:49

    Omg this is so old! I puke on partially colored pictures! They’re all just so: “ohijustgotmyfirstdslrandnowimlearningphotoshop”.

    A solid good picture doesn’t need the effect to look good!

     
     
    #65
    La Cinyc
    May 11th, 2010 at 00:07

    @chris
    Do remember that “solid good pictures” can also be “tampered” with, in fact, that’ what photoshop is the digital version of ;)

    Either way, still think a good contrasted b/w with a touch of colour can have the right effect when used at the right time, as does any style…

    Something “simple” isn’t per se bad, au contraire.

    But I do follow you on the “not so new of an effect” concept…

    but not as bad as “sepiatints” all over the place… (again, even though at the right moment, right place … )

     
     
    #66
    wika57
    May 12th, 2010 at 01:51

    im sorry this is just not a nice effect

     
     
    #67
    Seoshneg
    May 12th, 2010 at 15:12

    Creative Photos. Very good list

     
     
    #68
    Chris
    May 12th, 2010 at 19:34

    @La Cinyc

    You do, of course, have a valid point. And I was probably being a bit too harsh in my previous comment.

    As You say, the effect should be used “at the right time”. The “problem” is that some people over-use it, so it becomes totally passé. So when it is used on a picture where it’s really called for, it will drown in the flood of all the other pictures with partial coloring.

    I really don’t have any problem with sepia tints, since it’s something that is done evenly over the entire picture, like choosing between color or b/w, or like adjusting the contrast, brightness, e.t.c. Tone mapping on the other hand..*shudders* :) But again, sometimes it really looks good! But in 49 out of 50 pictures, it just looks plain bad, in my not so humble opinion :)

     
     
    #69
    La Cinyc
    May 12th, 2010 at 21:59

    @Chris

    Well, that is all I needed to hear ;) a bit of a “nuance” instead of “nuisance”.
    As it is with everything, there are always 2 sides… not necessarily to everyone’s liking.
    If you indeed play with matters as a “whole” (sepia, b/w, …) there is less chance of failure in the design as well.

     
     
    #70
    Chris
    May 12th, 2010 at 22:51

    I have my bad days and my good days, you know :) I’m normally not so “closed-minded” as in my previous comment. Indeed I do have my opinions on matters, especially photography. I’m a passionate post-semipro, who turned to do it for myself, not for others. The photography, that is.

    Indeed, I’m a little bit “conservative”, even though I have a year left before i strike the 30-mark. I don’t really like HDR (or to be correct, tone mapping that is over-done.), partial coloring, excessive editing, cloning, e.t.c. e.t.c.

    As a photographer, I’ve “gone through” different phases. One in which i produced several partial colored pictures. I’ve also done my fair share of HDR/tone map, even though that was quite recently. What can I say? I had to try it :) Although, I didn’t publish any of the results.

    I do also realize that some people think about my style in photography as I think about partially colored photographs. My style is kind of dark and contrasty. Often, but not always, preserving as much details in the shadows as possible, while the shadows still being dark. To my help I have my beloved film, the Tri-X 400, which I mainly run through my Hasselblad 500C -67. The Tri-X is fantastic for someone like me who loves dark and moody pictures. I do shoot digital as well, not as much though. I do it with a 5D and an 85/1.2 lens.

     
    (Comments won't nest below this level)
     
    #71
    Hater free
    May 15th, 2010 at 02:43

    Why are people so cynical of others passions. Im sure the person that photographed these and worked on them was very proud, and with good reason. Why do all you jerks come in here and insult it for no reason? I dont understand. Dont you have anything better to do? Leave a nice compliment that says “wow these are pretty” or dont say anything at all. Theres so much negativity in this world. This was a tiny glimpse of the positive and you came and tried to ruin it. How sad you and your life must be.

     
     
    #72
    Chris
    May 15th, 2010 at 09:04

    That’s probably the worst bullshit I’ve ever read.

    So no one is entitled to an opinion, and no one have the right to express their opinion? Who are you, Kim Jong Il??? (if You don’t know who Kim Jong Il are, then you really need to get yourself an education)

    “Im sure the person that photographed these and worked on them was very proud”: First of all, this is a compilation of pictures gathered throughout the internet, these are NOT made by a single artist. And secondly, if You put your pictures on the internet for comments, of course You have to be prepared for negative comments.

    Did you read the text at the beginning of the blog post? “Whatever the use, this fresh technique is popping up all over print design and on the web, and we’ve gathered some of the best examples here for you to enjoy.”. But the technique is not fresh at all! It’s old. It’s like calling stick figure cartoons “fresh”. It’s just plain wrong.

     
     
    #73
    Janos
    May 15th, 2010 at 09:24

    It’s not cynical telling the truth. The title of the post says: Outstanding photos. These are not. People are visiting this site, to get inspiration, learn something or just to share their opinions. The world doesn’t works like “wow these are pretty” or don’t say anything at all. Everybody having the same opinion is not positive, it is a nightmare.

     
     
    #74
    La Cinyc
    May 15th, 2010 at 13:44

    Just adding an extra comment here…
    Since, I already went into the stream by not agreeing fully with chris’s statement, I do think differing from the way you look at things, differing from opinions and while going the other direction of the nice palette of opinions, he did state “why” he didn’t like it.
    So I think his comments were finding some ground in a decent foundation…

    By the way, I think any “artist” or “designer” (quotes intended ;) ) will love to hear something else than agreement on their work. This way they can put the critics in mind and maybe even change bits and pieces in their work. Of course, only when they agree, because in the end we all just have to do whatever we want to do, no matter what anyone says.

    Just saying that it is a little bit more complex than just having yay and ney sayers.
    It’s like not really liking picasso but yet the paintings sell for millions of dollars…

    so please, keep on bringing “founded” critics and keep the discussion going….

    PS: if anyone would have said: “This shit is crap” . Without any explanation at all, now that would be bad…

     
     
    #75
    juan
    May 23rd, 2010 at 00:28

    awesome photography..loved it all

     
    Name (required)

    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)

    Web-site

    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

Home| Advertising| About| Contact

© 2010 All Rights Reserved