<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Browser Testing: A Family Tree</title> <atom:link href="http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/</link> <description>Web Design Resources and Tutorials</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <item><title>By: Markus</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-582320</link> <dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:53:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-582320</guid> <description>Great overview of engines per device. Love it. And now something uprising.I think we should live the IE behind. I just don&#039;t care anymore. For non client work/business work there is no reason to care. IE users do not deserve my sites any ways. If more designers would follow and make their sites look crappy on IE (which happens usually automatically), IE users would learn and use reasonable browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great overview of engines per device. Love it. And now something uprising.</p><p>I think we should live the IE behind. I just don&#8217;t care anymore. For non client work/business work there is no reason to care. IE users do not deserve my sites any ways. If more designers would follow and make their sites look crappy on IE (which happens usually automatically), IE users would learn and use reasonable browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer R</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-582296</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer R</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:47:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-582296</guid> <description>Nice working, thank you very much :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice working, thank you very much <img
src='http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JP</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581829</link> <dc:creator>JP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581829</guid> <description>GREAT!!! When it comes to browsers. Can&#039;t we all just get along?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT!!! When it comes to browsers. Can&#8217;t we all just get along?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pixel</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581824</link> <dc:creator>Pixel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 07:24:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581824</guid> <description>The world would surely be a better place without IE. Nothing causes more stress to designers than this crappy browser.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world would surely be a better place without IE. Nothing causes more stress to designers than this crappy browser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Interieur</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581783</link> <dc:creator>Interieur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:31:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581783</guid> <description>And right you are ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And right you are <img
src='http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Teacher Teacher</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581744</link> <dc:creator>Teacher Teacher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:25:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581744</guid> <description>This is one more area  - like brands of toothpaste - where we just have more variety than we need!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one more area  &#8211; like brands of toothpaste &#8211; where we just have more variety than we need!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexander Dawson</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581731</link> <dc:creator>Alexander Dawson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581731</guid> <description>Thanks for the feedback everyone!Interieur: Indeed I did not include the PS3 or the PSP in this article due to their use of a less well known and more obscure rendering engine called NetFront. I did mention NetFront itself within the global list of various desktop and mobile rendering engines however as the range of devices which use it are limited I felt that keeping the more detailed list to the &quot;big four&quot; would prove the best policy in this case!yooguruto: You are indeed correct about the spelling (a small typo there on my part), however you are incorrect about the mentioning of Maxthon not using Gecko. The early versions of Maxthon (or Maxthon Classic as it&#039;s sometimes known) did indeed have the ability to render a page in Gecko in opposition to trident. When writing the article I went back to a previous version to verify that this was indeed the case. However it&#039;s also true that they have dropped such support in later versions to make way for WebKit.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback everyone!</p><p>Interieur: Indeed I did not include the PS3 or the PSP in this article due to their use of a less well known and more obscure rendering engine called NetFront. I did mention NetFront itself within the global list of various desktop and mobile rendering engines however as the range of devices which use it are limited I felt that keeping the more detailed list to the &#8220;big four&#8221; would prove the best policy in this case!</p><p>yooguruto: You are indeed correct about the spelling (a small typo there on my part), however you are incorrect about the mentioning of Maxthon not using Gecko. The early versions of Maxthon (or Maxthon Classic as it&#8217;s sometimes known) did indeed have the ability to render a page in Gecko in opposition to trident. When writing the article I went back to a previous version to verify that this was indeed the case. However it&#8217;s also true that they have dropped such support in later versions to make way for WebKit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Laira</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581725</link> <dc:creator>Laira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:15:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581725</guid> <description>Great article...really helpful..thanks for sharing this wonderful post..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article&#8230;really helpful..thanks for sharing this wonderful post..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terry</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581718</link> <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:58:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581718</guid> <description>Wow. Thanks for taking the time to be so detail-oriented and comprehensive. This will always be a learning process as the browsers and devices are constantly evolving. Keep it up!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Thanks for taking the time to be so detail-oriented and comprehensive. This will always be a learning process as the browsers and devices are constantly evolving. Keep it up!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: adam</title><link>http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2010/05/browser-testing-a-family-tree/#comment-581717</link> <dc:creator>adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/?p=17356#comment-581717</guid> <description>Good post, it&#039;s always useful to see these statistics.  I wish IE users will switch to Firefox sometime soon..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, it&#8217;s always useful to see these statistics.  I wish IE users will switch to Firefox sometime soon..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 492/495 objects using disk

Served from: www.webdesignerdepot.com @ 2012-02-11 02:56:26 -->
