• 7 Jul

    20 Amazing Examples of HDR Portraits

    Effects, Inspiration, Photography

    Share

    Sponsored by: Click here to create FREE Flash Website!

    High Dynamic Range (HDR) images can really take your photography to the next level.

    But creating compelling HDR images, whether through fake HDR techniques in Photoshop or multiple exposures and tone-mapping, can be tricky.

    Creating portraits can be even trickier, because human subjects are often less forgiving in HDR photos.

    But you can do a few different things to get better results with your HDR portraits every time.

    Below are 20 examples of excellent portraits representing a variety of HDR techniques.

    For great HDR portraits, first make sure the skin of your subjects doesn’t take on gray tones, which can make them look like zombies and isn’t exactly attractive. This is a common problem with fake HDR images.

    Make sure your subjects aren’t moving in the image, either. Blurring from hand and arm movement is the most common, because keeping these limbs perfectly still for more than a few seconds is difficult. You can fix blurring in the processing stage if you watch out for it.

    This generally isn’t an issue with fake HDR images (unless the image is blurry to begin with), but it can be a big problem with real HDRs done with tone-mapping and multiple images.

    Don’t make your images too flat. Again, this is more common with fake HDR, but spoiling a tone-mapped image is possible, too, if you process it too much. Flat images, especially of people, tend to look fake and lifeless.

    Remember that the original purpose of HDR photography was to make images more accurately show the colors and shadows that the human eye perceives.

    Keep this in mind when creating your own images and you’ll likely get better results. Producing great HDR images that are artistic and creative, without looking strange, is still possible.


     


    Which ones are your favorites? Feel free to share your own HDR portraits with us in the comments’ area below…



  • 48 Comments »

     
    #1
    Mars
    July 7th, 2009 at 8:47 am

    woow! those are just one amazing list of great HDR

     
    1 Reply
     
    #2
    maria
    July 7th, 2009 at 9:50 am

    I like the ones from Carl Carl and Carlzon. Good jobs.

     
     
    #3
    timsky
    July 7th, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Nice collection!

    Actually I don’t think that hdr is good for people portraits, but theese examples are trully nice.

    And I want to share one photo, that I took last year in egypt:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/crayzeee/2870396300/

     
     
    #4
    vikas ghodke
    July 7th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    woow superb list of hdr

     
     
    #5
    Oliver
    July 7th, 2009 at 10:40 am

    yes … really amazing – but some will be better in hires.

     
     
    #6
    Andrew Wilkinson
    July 7th, 2009 at 10:45 am

    To be perfectly honest, nearly all HDR photos are terrible – with the photographer just plain using it as a gimmick. Unfortunately most of these are no exception (but they’re still better than 90% of the OMG PHOTOMATIX TOPAZ ADJUST CLARITY+100 SATURATION+100 stuff floating around there, haha.) The old man with the cigarette (near the middle) is an example of a potentially great photo that’s been ruined with overprocessing. HDR is kinda like Photoshop filters, too often people implement it thinking it will make their photos good, without understanding the purpose behind it: to capture a higher dynamic range in one image than a single exposure would allow.

    The picture of the dude in the hood with his face covered is a great example of an increased dynamic range; and while the girl with the teddy picture is a tad unrealistic looking, it really does benefit from the processing as well.

    HDR done right is like good design, it becomes (nearly) invisible and can be incredible. The top four are great, everything below them ranges from average to bad, except for a couple. Love the blog, but most of these portraits are definitely not “amazing.” Sorry to be so negative!

     
    2 Replies
     
    #7
    onpurpose
    July 7th, 2009 at 11:20 am

    First picture (old man) definitely the best!

     
     
    #8
    elisa
    July 7th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Some are fine, but some are too exagerated.

     
     
    #9
    d1ve2blu3
    July 7th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

    great photos..

     
     
    #10
    Wojciech Bednarski
    July 7th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
     
     
    #11
    robb
    July 7th, 2009 at 12:15 pm

    HDR awesomeness to the max.
    is it #2 mike shinoda ?
    btw #13 is lovely.

     
     
    #12
    Marta
    July 7th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Nice! Old people`s portraits are amazing. I must try do to something like this. :) Thx for shearing.

     
     
    #13
    Raul Albu
    July 7th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    These pics are really good, and everything on this site is very amazing!

     
     
    #14
    Nicholas Z. Cardot
    July 7th, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    I love HDR. It just does something to an image that really makes it stand out from the rest. Thanks for putting this collection together.

     
    1 Reply
     
    #15
    j. riebelle
    July 7th, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    The Pictures Simply look Alive and living.
    Cool HDR!

     
     
    #16
    erk
    July 7th, 2009 at 2:41 pm

    the old-men-in-hdr-93636326 is very interesting

     
     
    #17
    JanB
    July 7th, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    This post definitely killed HDR for me.

     
    1 Reply
     
    #18
    Irene
    July 7th, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    all great!!! i liked most the 8th one. Beautiful eye reflection and great colors!!!

     
     
    #19
    OsirisAD
    July 7th, 2009 at 5:24 pm

    I feel like it bears mentioning that none of these are examples of high dynamic range. In fact, with the short depth of field a human face occupies, its nearly impossible to get the kind of varied light conditions that would warrant, or even allow for high dynamic range photography.

    I don’t mean to be argumentative; some of these are great examples of photo manipulation and skilled post-processing, but they are not HDR.

     
     
    #20
    Uncle_zed
    July 7th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    I say NO! for HDR , asspecialy in these way.

     
     
    #21
    Simon
    July 7th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    at least half of them are not HDR, just “get rid of all the shadows and mess around with the tones and colors like a complete retard”-pictures.

    there´s not much out there which looks as stupid as a bad try of making a HDR …

    but those are quite nice:
    http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/hdr_portraits/day-1_365-it%27s-cold-outside.jpg
    http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/hdr_portraits/New-but-not-new-HDR-by-carl.jpg
    http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/hdr_portraits/1.jpg
    http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/hdr_portraits/10.jpg

     
     
    #22
    joel k.
    July 7th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    amazing 3d effect, all most as the natural eye
    doing a Google search I found some pretty good tutorials.

    the last photo is in my opinion the best, really i can’t find the photoshop in him.

    thanks.
    keep it up :)

     
    1 Reply
     
    #23
    Jake Rocheleau
    July 7th, 2009 at 6:17 pm

    Some of these pictures look so realistic they almost seem fake. This is an incredible collection!

     
     
    #24
    Adam
    July 7th, 2009 at 6:57 pm

    Some of the best HDR I’ve seen – the detail in some of those photos is immense!

     
     
    #25
    Marc
    July 7th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    My word…

    Most of these images have nothing to do with HDR.

    So many people think they create an excellent HDR just by playing a bit around with tools like Photomatix et cetera. Wrong. It’s about High Dynamic Range.

    Think about that…

     
     
    #26
    Jesse
    July 7th, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    This is just one of the worst collections of photography I have ever seen. I can’t wait for the HDR and over-processing fad to die away, because it is truly tacky and awful.

     
     
    #28
    Eric
    July 8th, 2009 at 1:06 am

    “Producing great HDR images that are artistic and creative, without looking strange, is still possible.”

    Then why did you include so many images that look “strange”???

     
     
    #29
    Walter
    July 8th, 2009 at 1:33 am

    Thanks for both the positive and negative feedback.

    I understand that not everyone likes these images and that’s ok. Ultimately, the beauty of an image resides in the eye of the observer.

    The selection was purely based on personal opinions and nothing else.

    All images were labeled as HDR, so yes, they’re HDR unless the photographer misrepresented them.

     
     
    #30
    shirley
    July 8th, 2009 at 3:17 am

    amazing details!!

     
     
    #31
    Custodio
    July 8th, 2009 at 3:39 am

    Hi

    I love all the pictures but I don’t know the HDR technique. Is this done with some software or what?

    Thanls

     
    1 Reply
     
    #32
    Marc
    July 8th, 2009 at 10:44 am

    “All images were labeled as HDR, so yes, they’re HDR unless the photographer misrepresented them.”

    Yep.

    And guess what? Most people labeling their photos as HDR don’t even understand a single bit about HDR. Like I said: playing a bit around with Photomatix doesn’t mean in any way the result is a HDR…

     
     
    #33
    upladupla
    July 8th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    I will never understand fascination of badlu made HDRs made by default settings in Photomatix and then tortured via PS filters like: shadow/highlight, desaturate and sharpen.

    Good HDR cannot be done from very single shot Use tripod, EV or T bracketing, collect 3 or 4 shots, stack them, work with tablet on layers and try to make image that radiates light. HDR trickery is to create natural looking photos when available light is limited. Dont be lazy to use stupid plugins.

    Sorry but I cannot find any mastery in muddy looking faces, bright or grey halos around objects and horrible oversharping.

     
     
    #34
    Paul Benjamin
    July 9th, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    Agree with Marc on this one, there are no HDR pictures shown here, just some one mapped images.

    To have an increased dynamic range, you need to be taking more than one exposure of the subject, not just re-processing the RAW file (this just remaps the contrast curves with the data which was already present).

    Some pretty nice portraits, but none (that I can see) which are from more than one original exposure.

     
    1 Reply
     
    #35
    Theo
    July 9th, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    Hmm… ‘Amazing’ isn’t quite the word. In agreement with a lot of others – the majority of these look over done, or like they’ve been quickly ruined by some Photoshop effects. Some are effective (like the 4th and 7th ones), but some are freekishly un-life like.

     
     
    #36
    Daniel
    July 9th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    Like the blonde ;)

     
     
    #37
    Mark
    July 9th, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    It’s interesting how something like this divides people. Personally I find pretty much all of these portraits unattractive, as I do most other so-called HDR images. There’s no wrong or right when it comes to this kind of thing, of course, and who knows where experimenting with techniques like this can lead people.

    But I have to laugh when people say that any of these portraits look natural. I doubt even the creator would say that. None of these look natural in any way. Perhaps what we each physically see is as subjective as our opinions.

    Before this ‘HDR’ craze started there was a guy in Eastern Europe producing worked-over portraits of old guys that really were interesting. I don’t remember his name but some of these pics, like the old guy with cigarette, look like attempts to copy that look, but they fall far short.

    One thing that’s not so subjective is how badly pics like this print at a decent size, the process is extremely pixel destructive, especially when you’re working from just one original file.

     
    1 Reply
     
    #38
    Peter J. Crowley
    July 10th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    Film. Black and White. Rules. enjoy pjc

     
     
    #39
    Phil Sharp
    July 11th, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Awful.

    Only image 7 holds any interest.

    I feel the rest is simply bad portraiture, focusing on digital technique rather than attempting to relate something about the sitter.

    HRD / Fake HRD is a fad.

     
     
    #40
    Gilli
    July 16th, 2009 at 7:07 pm

    Terror face in the first….awesome photographs

     
     
    #41
    The baldchemist
    July 17th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    So what happened to my commentsmy friend? When i take the time to look at your site, you invited us to make comment, I wrote a couple of sentences and…… Nothing?

     
     
    #42
    bethany
    July 26th, 2009 at 6:18 am

    this had very good detail niiiiiiicccccccccceeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     
     
    #43
    ben
    August 15th, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    very cool………

     
     
    #44
    Flanker
    September 3rd, 2009 at 1:11 am

    Why photographers feel the need to perform HDR hackery on images with as little as 2-3 stops of dynamic range is beyond me.

    10+ stops? Yes. 2 stops? Absolutely no need at all.

     
     
    #45
    boudarqa nabil
    September 10th, 2009 at 5:13 pm

    j ador les photoes artistique

     
     
    #46
    pesho
    September 17th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    #3 is the most beautiful
    thanks

     
     
    #47
    Dee
    October 13th, 2009 at 12:31 am

    None of these are HDR images. An HDR image is a composite of several photos of the same scene taken with bracketed exposures. The scene should have at least a 7 stop difference between the highlights and the shadows. This gives the image detail in both the highlights and shadows. These are just examples of very bad post processing. It’s nearly impossible to create an HDR portrait unless the person you are photographing can stay absolutely still for at least 30 seconds while you bracket exposures.

    I mean I could be wrong about this. If the internet photographers say its an HDR it could be. I’m only a photography student who spent 3 months learning about HDR images.

     
    1 Reply
     
    #48
    Portrait Artist
    November 20th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Wow! How beautiful and surreal the colors are! The photos create a really strong impression. Thanks for this beautiful post!

     
    Name (required)

    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)

    Web-site

    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)

Home| Advertising| About| Contact

© 2009 All Rights Reserved